The Short Answer
Premises liability holds property owners responsible when their negligence causes an injury on their property. You can sue a property owner in Colorado when they owed you a duty of care, breached that duty through unsafe conditions or Inadequate maintenance, and that breach directly caused your injuries. Whether you have a case depends on your legal status on the property (invitee, licensee, or trespasser) and whether the owner knew or should have known about the dangerous condition.
—
You slip on an icy walkway outside a Monument grocery store. A Negligent security policy leaves you assaulted in a Colorado Springs apartment parking garage. A broken stair at a rental property in Fountain sends you to the emergency room. All of these scenarios fall under premises liability — but what does that actually mean under Colorado law, and when can you hold a property owner accountable?
Understanding premises liability matters because not every injury on someone else’s property gives you the right to sue. The law draws careful distinctions based on why you were there, what the owner knew, and what steps they took (or failed to take) to keep the property safe.
What Premises Liability Means Under Colorado Law
Premises liability is a specific area of personal injury law that applies when a dangerous or defective condition on someone else’s property causes you harm. The legal foundation sits in Colorado’s Premises Liability Act, codified at C.R.S. § 13-21-115, which defines what property owners owe different categories of visitors.
Unlike a car accident where negligence rules are relatively straightforward, premises liability cases require proving the property owner had a duty to you specifically — and that duty changes depending on your legal status when you stepped onto the property.
This isn’t about holding property owners liable for every accident that happens on their land. It’s about accountability when owners fail to meet their legal obligations to maintain safe conditions or warn of known hazards.
Types of Accidents Covered by Premises Liability
Premises liability encompasses a wide range of injuries. Common cases Bradford Pelton PC handles in Colorado Springs and surrounding areas include:
Slip and fall accidents — The classic premises liability claim. Wet floors without warning signs at a Powers Boulevard retail store. Uneven pavement in a Cimarron Hills parking lot. Ice accumulation on walkways in Black Forest. These cases turn on whether the property owner knew or should have known about the hazard and failed to fix it or warn visitors.
Inadequate maintenance — Broken handrails on apartment stairs in Security-Widefield. Poorly lit stairwells that cause falls. Structural defects that collapse under normal use. Property owners have a legal duty to maintain their premises in a reasonably safe condition for lawful visitors.
Negligent security — When inadequate security measures — broken locks, non-functioning cameras, insufficient lighting, lack of security personnel — contribute to an assault, robbery, or other violent crime. These cases often arise in apartment complexes, parking garages, hotels, and businesses where prior criminal activity should have prompted better protection.
Elevator and escalator injuries — Mechanical failures, sudden stops, entrapment injuries. Property owners must maintain elevators and escalators according to safety codes and respond promptly to known defects.
Dog bites and animal attacks — Colorado’s dog bite statute creates strict liability in many circumstances, but premises liability principles also apply when a property owner knows a dangerous animal is on the premises and fails to control it or warn visitors.
Swimming pool accidents — Drownings and near-drownings caused by inadequate fencing, broken gates, lack of supervision in commercial settings, or hidden hazards like broken drains.
Toxic exposure — Mold, asbestos, carbon monoxide, lead paint. When property owners know about toxic conditions and fail to remediate or warn, they can be held liable for resulting illnesses.
The common thread: a dangerous condition existed, the property owner knew or should have known about it, and they failed to fix it or provide adequate warning before you were injured.
The Three Categories of Visitors — And Why It Matters
Colorado law doesn’t treat all visitors the same. Under C.R.S. § 13-21-115(3), your legal status when you entered the property determines what duty the owner owed you. That duty shapes whether you can sue.
Invitees receive the highest level of protection. You’re an invitee if the property owner invited you onto the property for a purpose that benefits them — customers in a store, clients in an office, diners in a restaurant, residents in apartment common areas. Property owners owe invitees a duty to use reasonable care to protect against dangers the owner knew or should have known about through reasonable inspection. That includes a duty to inspect the property regularly for hazards.
Licensees are social guests or others present with the owner’s permission but not for the owner’s benefit. A friend visiting your house. A mail carrier. The owner’s duty to licensees is narrower: warn of dangers the owner created or dangers the owner actually knew about that the licensee did not know about. The owner generally has no duty to inspect for or discover hidden hazards when it comes to licensees.
Trespassers receive minimal protection. Colorado law holds property owners liable to trespassers only for willful or deliberate injury. Property owners generally can’t set traps or intentionally harm someone, even someone who has no right to be there. But they owe no duty to maintain safe conditions or warn trespassers of hazards.
These distinctions matter enormously. An invitee injured by a hazard the owner should have discovered through routine inspection has a strong case. A trespasser injured by the same hazard almost certainly does not — unless the owner deliberately created the danger.
What You Must Prove to Win a Premises Liability Case
Every premises liability claim in Colorado requires proving four elements. Miss one, and your case fails.
Duty of care — The property owner owed you a legal duty based on your status (invitee, licensee, or trespasser). This is usually straightforward for customers, tenants, and invited guests. It becomes complicated when the line between categories blurs — like a customer who wanders into an employee-only area.
Breach of duty — The property owner violated that duty through action or inaction. They knew or should have known about a dangerous condition and failed to fix it, cordon it off, or provide adequate warning. For invitees, “should have known” is key — it brings in the concept of regular inspection and maintenance. For licensees, you must show actual knowledge.
Causation — The breach directly caused your injury. This requires both “cause in fact” (but for the hazard, you wouldn’t have been injured) and “proximate cause” (the injury was a foreseeable result of the unsafe condition). If you tripped over your own shoelace while walking past a dangerous condition, causation breaks down.
Damages — You suffered actual harm. Medical bills. Lost wages. Pain and suffering. Permanent disability. Property damage. Colorado requires proof of real, compensable losses. Bruised pride doesn’t count.
Bradford Pelton PC builds premises liability cases by documenting each element through medical records, incident reports, photos of the hazard, witness statements, maintenance logs (or lack thereof), prior complaints, and expert testimony when needed. Alex Kerr personally handles the investigation and evidence-gathering from day one — you won’t be handed off to a paralegal while the attorney moves on to the next file.
Common Defenses Property Owners Use
Property owners and their insurers don’t just roll over. They fight premises liability claims with predictable defenses.
“You were trespassing” — If they can reclassify you as a trespasser instead of an invitee or licensee, your case collapses. They’ll argue you had no permission to be in that area, even if you were a lawful visitor elsewhere on the property.
“The hazard was open and obvious” — Colorado law generally holds that property owners have no duty to warn of conditions that are open and obvious to a reasonable person. If the danger was plainly visible and you should have seen it, the owner may not be liable. But this defense isn’t absolute — a hazard can be open and obvious yet still unreasonably dangerous.
“We didn’t know about it” — Property owners argue they had no actual or constructive knowledge of the hazard. For invitees, this often turns into a battle over inspection practices: how often did they inspect, when was the last inspection before your injury, was the hazard present long enough that reasonable inspection would have caught it?
“You caused your own injury” — Comparative negligence. Colorado follows a modified comparative negligence rule under C.R.S. § 13-21-111. If you were partially at fault — distracted on your phone, ignoring warning signs, wearing inappropriate footwear — your recovery is reduced by your percentage of fault. If you’re found 50% or more at fault, you recover nothing. Property owners weaponize comparative negligence to attack your credibility and shift blame.
“You signed a liability waiver” — Waivers can limit liability in some recreational and commercial settings, but they don’t provide blanket immunity. Colorado law won’t enforce waivers that attempt to exempt gross negligence or willful misconduct. A waiver’s enforceability depends on its language, the circumstances, and the nature of the claim.
Experienced premises liability attorneys know how to counter these defenses with evidence of the owner’s knowledge, prior incidents, inadequate inspection protocols, and the foreseeability of harm.
The Statute of Limitations for Premises Liability Claims
You have a limited window to file. Under C.R.S. § 13-80-102(1)(a), negligence claims for bodily injury must be commenced within two years after the cause of action accrues — which is typically the date of injury.
Miss that deadline and your claim is barred. No exceptions for “I didn’t know I could sue” or “I was trying to settle with the insurance company.” The two-year clock starts ticking the day you fall, get bitten, or suffer the injury.
Waiting until year two to contact an attorney puts you at a severe disadvantage. Evidence disappears. Witnesses forget. Surveillance footage gets deleted. Property conditions change. That’s why Bradford Pelton PC encourages injured people to reach out early, even if they’re not sure they have a case — the free consultation costs nothing, and starting the investigation promptly preserves the evidence you need to win.
When to Contact a Premises Liability Attorney in Colorado Springs
You should consult a premises liability attorney if:
- You were injured on someone else’s property through no fault of your own.
- The injury resulted from a dangerous condition — wet floor, broken stair, inadequate lighting, criminal attack due to poor security, dog bite, structural defect.
- You incurred medical expenses, lost wages, or ongoing pain and impairment.
- The property owner or their insurer is denying responsibility or offering an inadequate settlement.
- You’re not sure whether you were an invitee, licensee, or trespasser — or whether the owner had notice of the hazard.
Even if you think your case is small or you’re partly to blame, a consultation clarifies your options. Insurance adjusters count on you not knowing the law. They’ll tell you that you can’t recover because the hazard was “obvious” or because you weren’t watching where you were going. Sometimes they’re right. Often they’re not.
That’s why we offer a free consultation to every potential client — because understanding your options shouldn’t cost you anything when you’re already dealing with medical bills and lost wages.
What to Expect From the Legal Process
Premises liability cases follow a predictable arc, though every case is different.
Investigation and evidence preservation — Your attorney gathers incident reports, photos, medical records, witness statements, and any available video. If the property is commercial, maintenance logs and prior complaints become critical. In negligent security cases, we look at crime statistics for the area and the property’s history of incidents.
Notice to the property owner — Depending on whether the owner is a government entity or private party, formal notice requirements may apply. Your attorney handles this.
Insurance claim and negotiation — Most property owners carry liability insurance. We submit a claim outlining the facts, the injuries, the owner’s breach of duty, and the damages. Negotiations follow. Many cases settle before a lawsuit is filed, but only if the insurer takes the claim seriously.
Litigation if necessary — If settlement talks stall or the offer is inadequate, we file a lawsuit. Discovery follows: depositions, interrogatories, document requests. Expert witnesses may be needed to establish causation, the standard of care for property maintenance, or future medical needs.
Trial or settlement — The vast majority of premises liability cases settle. But settlement leverage depends on the strength of the case and the insurer’s belief that you’re willing to go to trial. Bradford Pelton PC prepares every case as if it will go to trial — and that preparation drives better settlements.
Throughout the process, Alex Kerr personally manages your case. You won’t get shuffled to a junior associate or paralegal. You get the same attorney from consultation through resolution, someone who knows your case inside and out because they’ve handled it from day one.
Geographic Realities — Premises Liability in Colorado Springs and Surrounding Areas
Premises liability cases in the Pikes Peak region reflect the area’s mix of residential, commercial, and recreational properties. We see slip and fall claims from retail centers along Academy Boulevard and Powers Boulevard. Negligent security cases from apartment complexes in Fountain, Security-Widefield, and Cimarron Hills. Inadequate maintenance injuries in older buildings in Manitou Springs and downtown Colorado Springs. Rental property accidents in student housing near UCCS in Black Forest and family rentals in Woodland Park.
Winter weather complicates premises liability. Ice and snow accumulation on walkways, parking lots, and stairs injures many people every year in El Paso County. Colorado law doesn’t impose absolute liability for snow and ice — property owners must be given a reasonable time to clear hazards after a storm — but prolonged neglect, failure to salt or sand, and recurring icy conditions that go unaddressed can establish breach of duty.
We also handle premises liability cases stemming from recreational accidents. Canon City and Pueblo outdoor properties. Fitness centers and gyms. Swimming pools and water parks. Colorado’s recreational activities statute and liability waivers add complexity, but they don’t eliminate responsibility when property owners act recklessly or conceal known hazards.
Why the Same Attorney Handling Your Case From Start to Finish Matters
Premises liability cases turn on details. The difference between “the owner should have known” and “the owner had no reason to know” often comes down to a line in a maintenance log, a prior complaint, or a witness’s recollection of how long the hazard existed.
Big firms churn through volume. They do the intake, hand your file to a paralegal, and the attorney you met during the consultation may never touch your case again. That model works for processing claims, but it doesn’t work when the facts are contested and the insurer is dug in.
Bradford Pelton PC operates differently. When Alex Kerr takes your case, he handles it. He reviews the evidence. He depositions the witnesses. He negotiates with the insurance adjuster who’s heard his name before and knows he won’t fold. That continuity means nothing slips through the cracks, and you get someone who understands the nuances of your case — not a rotating cast of staff members reading your file for the first time.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Every case is different. Contact Bradford Pelton PC for a free consultation to discuss your specific situation.
—
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between premises liability and a personal injury claim?
Premises liability is a type of personal injury claim that specifically involves injuries caused by dangerous conditions on someone else’s property. While all premises liability cases are personal injury cases, not all personal injury claims involve property hazards — car accidents, medical malpractice, and product liability are separate categories. The key distinction is that premises liability focuses on the property owner’s duty to maintain safe conditions and warn of known hazards.
Can I sue if I was injured on government property in Colorado Springs?
Yes, but the process is more complicated. Claims against government entities in Colorado — whether city, county, or state property — fall under the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act. You must file a formal notice of claim within 180 days of the injury, and there are caps on damages. Examples include falls on poorly maintained city sidewalks, injuries in public parks, or accidents in government buildings. Missing the 180-day notice deadline typically bars your claim entirely.
How much is my premises liability case worth in Colorado?
Settlement value depends on the severity of your injuries, medical expenses, lost income, permanent impairment, and the strength of evidence showing the property owner’s negligence. Minor slip and fall cases with soft tissue injuries may settle for a few thousand dollars, while catastrophic injuries from negligent security or structural failures can reach six or seven figures. Colorado’s comparative negligence rule also impacts value — if you’re found partially at fault, your recovery is reduced proportionally. Every case is unique; an attorney can provide a realistic assessment after reviewing the facts.
What if the property owner claims the hazard was “open and obvious”?
Colorado law generally holds that property owners have limited duty to warn of open and obvious hazards, but this defense isn’t absolute. Even if a hazard was visible, the owner may still be liable if the condition was unreasonably dangerous or if circumstances distracted you or made avoidance impractical. For example, a large pothole in a dark parking lot may be “obvious” in daylight but hidden at night. We counter this defense by showing the hazard’s severity, the lack of reasonable alternatives, or the owner’s knowledge that injuries had occurred before.
Do I need a lawyer for a small premises liability claim?
You’re not required to hire a lawyer, but having legal representation often makes a difference in the outcome. Adjusters know unrepresented claimants don’t understand comparative negligence, don’t know how to value future medical expenses, and may accept the first offer without knowing whether it’s fair. Even in smaller cases, a consultation helps you understand what your claim is actually worth and whether the insurer’s offer is reasonable. Bradford Pelton PC offers free consultations — there’s no cost to find out if you’re leaving money on the table.
Can I still recover if I was partially at fault for my injury?
Yes, as long as you were less than 50% at fault. Colorado’s modified comparative negligence rule under C.R.S. § 13-21-111 reduces your recovery by your percentage of fault but doesn’t bar it entirely unless you’re 50% or more to blame. For example, if your total damages are $100,000 and you’re found 30% at fault for not watching where you were walking, you’d recover $70,000. If you’re 50% or more at fault, you recover nothing. This makes credibility and evidence critical — the insurer will try to inflate your fault percentage to reduce their payout.
—
**